Torfaen Constituency Labour Party

Promoted by Mark Ward-Jones on behalf of the Torfaen Constituency Labour Party at 27 Brunel Road, Fairwater, Cwmbran, Torfaen NP44 4QT.

Torfaen AM Raises Concerns In Senedd Over Varteg Payment Offers

DSC00788Lynne Neagle AM last week used a question to the Minister for Natural Resources to voice concerns over resident accounts of payments offered to them if the proposed opencast mining application in Varteg goes ahead.

These payments, understood to be £1000 per household per year for the duration of the scheme, were also taken up by the local AM in her response to the Council’s latest request for comments on the amended application [Closing date Friday 11th March 2016].

Lynne Neagle has previously written to the Welsh Government Minister and understands that whilst such payments (Community Benefits) are not prohibited, neither are they a part of the process nor should they make unacceptable developments acceptable because of them. Separate to S106 agreements, these relatively new payments are typically paid to whole communities such as for wind farm applications in England.

Guidance stipulates that openness, transparency and fairness should be at the core. Lynne Neagle believes further guidance is necessary to uphold these core principles in practice; which she called on the Welsh Government to produce for residents.

Speaking in the Chamber, Lynne Neagle AM said:

“Minister, I have recently written to you to express my concern that some residents of Varteg tell me that they’ve received payment offers of £1,000 per household for the duration of the proposed opencast scheme. Worryingly, when Torfaen council approached the developer, they were unable to obtain confirmation of any offers.

I believe that if such payments are within the law, then they should be made in an open and transparent manner and in discussion with all residents affected. Would you agree with me that making such offers to some residents and not others risks dividing a community and obscuring the transparent planning process? Will you look at issuing further guidance to protect residents in this situation?”

Responding, the Minister for Natural Resources, Carl Sargeant AM, said:

“I thank the Member for her question. Obviously, Presiding Officer, I’m unable to comment on a specific planning application when it’s a live application, but I do pay tribute to the Member who never ceases to seize the opportunity to raise this issue with me.

With regard to the more general point of the application about payments to communities, I would hope that it would be considered to be done in an open and transparent way, and if the Member wishes to write to me with more details, irrespective of the application, I will ask my team to look at it in detail.”

2 comments on “Torfaen AM Raises Concerns In Senedd Over Varteg Payment Offers

  1. Alun Roberts
    March 28, 2016

    This form of community bribery, (oops, surely I mean community wealth) is rife in such matters. In parts of Merthyr Tydfil, residents living closest to Miller Argent’s Ffros Y Fran opencast found cash sums and vouchers had been posted (in plain brown envelopes) into their homes.
    When confronted, MA bosses admitted that the payments where given to defray the costs by local residents for car washing and window cleaning services!
    Miller Argent neglected to mention this incentive to the wider community, and denied
    that the pecuniary advantage to these particular residents was an admission that the nearby opencast site was the direct source of dust pollution upon their vehicles and properties!
    This type of pernicious offer to residents in places like Varteg can only be viewed in one context. It’s a bung, a sweetener, an offer you can’t always refuse. Whatever you wish to call it, it’s an unfair advantage that is consistently used as hush money to placate, divide and sterilise community opinion on important planning applications such as opencast mining!
    So called community wealth payments as a form of divisive “compensation” should not be allowed, the abolition of such an inducement would leave the way clear for an equal debate in local authority planning and a more open and transparent decision making process without the need for the use of plain brown envelopes!


    • TorfaenLabour
      March 28, 2016

      Thank you for your comments Alun. Needless to say, Torfaen Labour cannot confirm or refute your statement regarding Ffros Y Fran.
      We can, however, report on the statement made by Lynne Neagle regarding the proposed Varteg opencast development.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: